Night Train to
Lisbon
Dir: Bille August
2013
***
Bille August's adaptation of Pascal Mercier's 2004
international best-seller Night Train to
Lisbon has a certain fluidity about it that the original doesn't have but the
development of our protagonist and what it all means just doesn't come
across as well and remains firmly between the pages of the novel. The book
is both historical and philosophical, looking at a part of history
now at the vantage point of hindsight and how such discoveries can affect us
individually. It keeps many aspects of the story from the reader, inviting them
to fill in the gaps, leaving much to interpretation and giving the same
experience to them as the story's protagonist to some extent. None of this
comes across in the film. However, Jeremy Irons (the film's protagonist)
carries the film rather successfully. Instead of saving a suicidal women on
a bridge and simply going to a library and stumbling on the book that
would lead to his adventure, he finds the book in the woman's coat and she
becomes connected with the story. It had to be done really to give context to
our protagonist's journey, which was already stretched beyond believability.
The original story's escapism through truth is brushed past but
unfortunately avoided, unintentionally too it seems. The adaptation's
introduction remains just as misleading as the original's but lose-ends are
tied up quite nicely towards the end, although I did find the conclusion a
little too cheerful for my tastes. It's a great little mystery, it just doesn't
know how to start or finish particularly well.
I don't think August's direction worked either, it never found the right
pace or mood, switching between average television drama to looking like a
mock/spoof trailer for a third-rate mystery/thriller. It has some big
names including Tom Courtenay, Charlotte Rampling, Bruno Ganz and
Christopher Lee but none of them are given a lot to work with. They all give
great performances considering what they've been given to work with, but their
glaring talent makes the rest of the film's production look bad. The actors fit
into stereotypical roles that don't match their talents, so they become
more of a distraction and something of style over content. They are wasted
performances really and the younger, lesser-known cast are far more impressive
but maybe that is how it should be. The film switches between the past and
present with confidence but the various modern day meetings never feel like
they weren't filmed at the same time, there is no sense of passing time in the
present day and far too much time is spent on the past, when really it should
have been more balanced with the present. The character development is
somewhat misleading, certain characters are built up just to be knocked down
and rebuilt. It's never that convincing and it soon becomes a drama-by-numbers
drama. The initial momentum is slowed right down once Lisbon is reached, this
isn't necessarily unwelcome at first but the story never really seems to
go anywhere, nor does it reach much of a conclusion. The book will make you
think but I'm afraid the film is more likely to make you sleep. However,
for all its faults, it does have its moments and Irons does keep the film
moving - enough for me to consider it a three star film, rather than just a two
star disappointment.
No comments:
Post a Comment