Ratcatcher
Dir: Lynne Ramsay
1999
*****
Everything that was great about Lynne Ramsay’s
short films is amplified in her debut feature. I’ve seen so many short films
and thought to myself “Someone give that director a heap of money” only to be
disappointed when they do. By 1999 Ramsay had gained a following and a
reputation, Ratcatcher was clearly produced by people who knew to let her have
full control and make it without compromise. Much like her previous films,
Ratcatcher is stark and disconnected. It feels almost dreamlike in its
hazy realism. The film is set in Glasgow in the early 1970s. The
city, despite its Victorian grandeur, has some areas with the poorest housing
conditions in western Europe, such as no running hot water, no bathing
facilities, and no indoor toilets. The city is midway through a major
re-development program, demolishing housing schemes and re-housing the tenants
in new modern estates. The problems in these schemes are somewhat compounded by
the binmen going on strike, creating an additional health hazard and a breeding
ground for rats. The main character, James, is a 12-year-old boy, growing up in
one of these schemes, which is gradually emptying as the re-housed tenants move
out. James, with the rest of his family, (two sisters, one older, one younger,
his mum and heavy-drinking father), patiently wait to be re-housed. The film
begins with James’s friend Ryan as he is forced to put on his wellington boots
to go visit his father in prison. Ryan runs off instead while his mother isn’t
looking and joins James who is playing near the canal. The friends are close
and partake in some rough play that leads to Ryan falling into the canal. The
tone of the film is set when Ryan, unable to climb out, drowns in the canal.
James bears much of the blame for not having raised the alarm but he believes
his inaction has gone unnoticed. James’s grief and guilt is the skeleton of the
film, we feel his pain through his quiet internal suffering – which makes for
uncomfortable viewing at times. Ryan's family is eventually re-housed and on
the day of leaving, and when Ryan's mother gives James the pair of brown
sandals that she'd bought for Ryan on the day of his death, it is like being
punched in the heart. James' one escape comes when he takes a bus to the end of
the line and ends up in the outskirts of the city, where a new housing estate
is under construction. He explores the half-built houses, and wonders in awe at
the view from the kitchen window: an expansive field of wheat, blowing in the
wind and reaching to the horizon. In a scene central to the film, he climbs
through the window and escapes into the blissful freedom of the field. His
freedom is literal and symbolic, he wants to be free of his living situation as
well as his mental torment. James befriends a girl, Margaret Anne, who he tries
to help after her glasses are thrown into the canal by the local gang. James
and Margaret Anne become close friends. She is his only other relief from his
home environment. Margaret Anne has problems of her own, and one of them is
allowing herself to be abused by the local gang. The duo find comfort in each
other's company. In one of the films most startling scenes, one of James'
friends, Kenny, receives a pet mouse as a birthday present. After the gang
throw the mouse around in the air to make him "fly", Kenny ties the
mouse's tail to a balloon, and in the most unexpected moments I’ve ever experienced
in a film, the film shows it floating to the moon. The mouse then joins a whole
colony of other mice frolicking on the moon, in a surreal dream-like fantasy
that is nothing like Ramsay’s previous work, or indeed the film up to that
point. It comes from nowhere and it is beautiful. Kenny later falls in the
canal and is rescued by James' father, making him briefly into a local hero.
Though the military eventually comes and cleans up all the garbage in the
neighbourhood, James realizes that his situation will most likely never change.
He plunges himself into the canal, and a brief scene is shown, in which James'
family is moving into a new neighbourhood without him. It’s this
stark realisation that brings the film back down to earth after the
excitement of fantasy. There are moments of hope and wonder but fact remains
that life is stark and brutal and James’s life is set out in front of him.
William Eadie is brilliant as James Gillespie, a non-actor directed perfectly
by one of the best directors working today. It’s a near perfect film all round,
everything fans wanted from a feature-length Ramsay film and so much more. To
balance gritty realism and almost absurdist fantasy so
beautifully takes a great talent and a visionary story teller. I just wish
Ramsay would direct more films that are written by her, although she continues
to improve her adaptations with her own input. It’s one of the last great films
of the twentieth century.
No comments:
Post a Comment