Showing posts with label Bernardo Bertolucci. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bernardo Bertolucci. Show all posts

Thursday, 5 November 2020

Me and You (Io e te)
Dir: Bernardo Bertolucci
2012
***
I found it difficult to watch Me and You and not wonder how this was a film by the same man who bought us such greats such as The Conformist, Last Tango in Paris, 1900 and The Last Emperor. I wasn’t a huge fan of 2003’s The Dreamers either but I had hoped that the last nine years was enough time to give his next project some real thought. I liked the concept, I just think it was totally wasted. It’s a sad looking swansong, that’s for sure. The story is simple: young Lorenzo (Jacopo Olmo Antinori) has difficulties communicating and relating to others – although I don’t think he autistic or anything – he just prefers his own company and his own thoughts. When his class goes to the mountains for a week on a skiing trip, Lorenzo secretly settles in the basement of his apartment building, pocketing the trip’s fee to spend on provisions. However, his happy solitude is interrupted with an unexpected appearance of a strange girl called Olivia (Tea Falco), who turns out to be his half-sister. Olivia, from his father’s first marriage, is nine years older than him and he hasn’t seen in a long time. She asks if his parents are at home, and he pretends not to know, thinking his parents might have asked her to investigate. A short while later he hears someone trying to open the lock to the basement and Olivia enters, looking for something in a box of her old things. She doesn’t find it and leaves in desperation. In the middle of the night she returns, knocking on the window and asking Lorenzo if she can stay the night. At first he refuses categorically, but when she threatens to tell everyone he is there, he backs down. This turns out to be useful, since his mother calls again, more insistent than ever that she needs to speak to a teacher, and he persuades Olivia to pretend to be one. It turns out, though, that Olivia has become a drug addict and is suffering from withdrawal from heroin, and this is why she’s in a desperate situation. She asks him for some sleeping pills. The only place he can think of getting them is from his grandmother (Veronica Lazar) who is dying in hospital. He visits her and finds the pills in her handbag, but ends up spending much longer at the hospital than intended when his grandmother wakes up and asks him to tell her a story. Once back in the basement, Lorenzo finds Olivia passed out, almost dead. During his absence she has rummaged through all the boxes and found and taken some sleeping pills. She sleeps solidly for three days. By the end of the week, the relationship between Lorenzo and Olivia has changed from hostility to complicity, since they both feel rejected by society, both have secrets, and both feel understood, without judgement, by the other. Olivia promises not to use drugs anymore and they both promise to stay in touch. On the last morning Lorenzo awakes to find a note Olivia has left, reminding him of their mutual promise. I don’t want to speak ill of Bernardo Bertolucci, he was a great director and I really admire that he made Me and You so late in his career, especially in relatively bad health, but I don’t think there was enough of him in the story. His greatest films are the ones where he has thrown himself into the picture, this film feels like someone else’s, Niccolò Ammaniti’s. I actually think that the two leads give great performances and the direction itself is adequate, I just don’t think the film worked as a whole. I think I would have preferred more static shots, with the odd contrasting moving sequence. The dialogue was also lacking, indeed, a really good script could have lifted the film no end. I did like the interjection of music and I could really relate to it at times, I just couldn’t connect with the characters. I think it all happened a little too fast and as well performed as Olivia was, I’m not sure I ever truly believed she existed. I think the difference between the original script and what was actually filmed was the biggest let down. I feel that a bold conclusion was softened for a wider audience, a decision that I feel backfired spectacularly. It’s a firework without ignition, it’s all there ready to explode but nothing ends up lighting it and even if a light was found, towards the end the wick becomes far to damp to ignite anyway. I’m being perhaps overly harsh, but this is the great Bernardo Bertolucci, it should have been a masterpiece. Like I said, it’s tragic that this was to be his last film and it’s not without its magic, it just makes me sad on several different levels is all.

Friday, 23 January 2015


The Dreamers
Dir: Bernardo Bertolucci
2003
**
Bernardo Bertolucci's The Dreamers is a love letter/tribute to the 1960's French New wave cinema movement and the political movements of the era in general (although it actually cheapens the work of the activists that it tries to acknowledge). I liked the interweaving footage of classic films and how the characters reenacted them but that's pretty much as far as my enthusiasm goes for this film. It doesn't come close to the films it tries to emulate, the script is far from intelligent, the acting is just okay but the characters are unlikable and actually quite unbelievable. I think this is down to bad direction. The actors were pretending, almost mimicking but not actually acting and it is neither erotic or sensual. Just because you see Eva Green's genitalia, does not make it sexy (believe it or not). If erotic is bathing in someones period blood and shagging ones own sibling then I'm quite happy to report there is nothing erotic about me. Seriously though, I'm no prude, there is story here but it's not the 'Ultra sexy' film it's been hailed as nor is it close to being a masterpiece. The Telegraph is quoted as saying 'Sometimes forbidden fruit is the most delectable' - dirty newspaper, I mean really, boobs are great but not when they belong to your sister! This film is as fake as it comes, maybe it's 40 years too late but then not all of the New wave was credible either. For me It was like like a bad Godard, but far worse.

Monday, 13 October 2014



Ten Minutes Older: The Cello
Dir: Bernardo Bertolucci, Mike Figgis, Jiri Menzel, Istvan Szabo, Claire Denis, Volker Schlondorff, Michael Radford, Jean-Luc Godard.
2002
*****
A some good/some great collection of short films produced by Wim Wenders and directed by an impressive ensemble of talented directors. All were given the theme of time and 10 minutes to do whatever they liked basically. The results were varied and wonderful. You'd have to ask Wenders why it's called The Cello though, I suspect it's down to his own love of jazz or something. This is the companion piece to The Trumpet.

Bernardo Bertolucci - Histoire d' eaux - A strange first film to start with really, it's beautifully shot, full of intrigue and is well acted. I can't say I totally understood it, I think it's to do with not forgetting who got you where you are but I'm really not sure. I did like the ending though.

Mike Figgis - About Time 2 - Typically, Figgis's entry is more of an art instillation than a film. Along the same lines as Timecode, he splits the screen into four parts. I actually really liked it. I loved Leaving Las Vegas but I hated Hotel, this film has got me interested in him again and is one of the better films of the collection.

Jiri Menzel - One moment - A touching memorial to the late great Czechoslovakian actor, Rudolf Hrusínský using archive footage of his films to show him ageing through the years. A nice piece, one that has made me want to look up Rudolf Hrusínský's films for sure.

Istvan Szabo - Ten Minutes after - A husband comes home and drunkenly beats his wife and gets stabbed in the process. We don't need to see this to realise how quickly things can change in a short amount of time. Unless I'm missing something, I feel that this was a very weak entry.

Claire Denis - Vers Nancy - An interesting conversation between two people on a train and stark conclusion highlighting the fact that we are on the cusp of change.

Volker Schlondorff - The Enlightenment - Easily my favourite of all the films in this collection, The Enlightenment analyses the very theory and concept of time through skinheads, a mosquito and the repeat visits to a German campsite. Absolutely brilliant!

Michael Radford - Addicted to the Stars - The 'Blockbuster' of the collection, Radford has thought outside the box and into the realms of 'What if'. A slow and moody piece of time and space travel. A good turn by Daniel Craig and a final chance to see the late great Charles Simon.

Jean-Luc Godard - Dans le noir du temps - Godard misses the point of the whole idea, maybe that's why his film is last. It seems lazy to me, he goes between out archive footage of the holocaust and his own films but never really makes any point. Maybe it's a personal film but to the viewer it's pointless and verging on tastelessness. Good old Godard eh!


As a collection and because of a couple of real stand out films, this is a five out of five film.