The Legend of Tarzan
Dir: David
Yates
2016
**
Edgar Rice
Burroughs' Tarzan has graced the small screen successfully and has
featured positively in radio, comics and graphic novels over the years but has
only prevailed once on the big screen in my opinion in 1984's Greystoke: The
Legend of Tarzan, Lord of the Apes. Disney made their version of Tarzan in 1999
which I wondered at the time would be the end of them and the less said about
1998's Casper Van Dien led Tarzan and the Lost City the better but an authentic
and honest big budget, live action adaptation has been touted around Hollywood
for over twenty years. Many ideas have been suggested and many writers have
come and gone, a Pirate of the Caribbean style action film had been on the
cards for quite some time and producers actually wanted to cast Olympic swimmer
Michael Phelps in the lead role, just as competitive swimmer Johnny Weissmuller
was cast in the 1930 and 1940s Tarzan films due to his unique physique.
However, after watching Michael Phelps' appearance
on Saturday Night Live the idea was scrapped rather swiftly. Casting
suggestions after that featured all the usual suspects but I'm quite glad they
went with Alexander Skarsgård in the end as although he certainly wasn't
an obvious choice, he was right for the more serious version of the character that
had been written which gave Tarzan a certain edge that I think worked well. The
role of Jane Porter could have been played by several Actors I can think of but
Margot Robbie was great and no doubt the best choice. Christoph Waltz on the
other hand just phoned his performance in. The film makers relied a little too
heavily on the villainous characters he'd played previously, his Captain Rom
could have easily been Hans Landa or Ernst Stavro Blofeld, but just with a
slightly different accent. I love Samuel L. Jackson and will watch anything
he's in but his comedy companion character is utterly pointless and a little
distracting, although I suppose I'm still glad he was there because I like him.
I'm glad the film wasn't a full on origins story, although Tarzan and Jane's
origins are explored via effective flashbacks, this is well done reworking of
the fifth Tarzan book, Tarzan and the Jewels of Opar, which simplifies the
story (removing the nonsense about the lost world of Atlantis) and includes an
element of actual history. The film is full of wonderful detail though which I
really appreciated. There is an early scene whereby Tarzan explains to a group
of curious children that the bone structure in his hands is different from
years of running on all fours and I liked his interaction with the animals in
the jungle. There is also a brilliant scene where Samuel L. Jackson shoots
the earlobe off a solder and delivers a wisecracking line so great I wondered
why he hadn't been cast as the film's bad guy. It's a very simplistic
adventure film but for once I think by keeping it simple they kept it
digestible. However, the script is truly awful. A low point came when Tarzan
and Samuel L. Jackson's character joke about licking the testicles of
Gorilla. It doesn't work, the characters don't have the right kind of
chemistry, it's not that kind of film and it just isn't funny, although
it did wake me up somewhat as it came at a rather slow and samey part of the
movie. The CGI is some of the worst I've seen, from the ridiculous length and
incorrect style of the CGI London streets seen at the beginning of the film to
the beyond ridiculous vine-swinging scenes where one vine, presumably hanging
hundreds of meters above the trees, can carry a man at least two miles. They
couldn't even get the trees right, which is a big problem when making a film
set largely in the jungle. The action sequences really let the film down, the
effective serious side of the story was pretty much ruined as the special
effects got more and more elaborate. It felt like three different films edited
together but only one of them was half decent. The scenes without special
effects were directed beautifully but rest of the film looked like a really
cheap cartoon. It was staggering to see the level of quality drop so quickly as
the film went on, I can't believe I kept with it right to the end. I really
don't know what Warner Bros. were thinking but this is not how to adapt a
classic and well-loved character to the big screen.
No comments:
Post a Comment