Hacksaw Ridge
Dir: Mel Gibson
2016
**
Hacksaw Ridge tells the story of Desmond Doss, a Seventh Day Adventist
who refused to carry a rifle during the Second World War. Doss was a pacifist
and a conscientious objector but still signed up when America joined the war to
do his duty, specifically requesting to work as a combat medic. He
single-handedly saved over a hundred lives without once picking up a gun and
firing. His stand was quite symbolic, military training is a form of control
and conformity, and as much as we might not like it, it works, so to be a
conscientious objector, refuse orders and somehow serve unarmed was
understandably seen as dangerous. His fellow solders gave him a hard time and
he narrowly avoided receiving a court marshal. However, his stand marked a stand
for civil liberties, he served his unit well, saving over one hundred lives
during fierce battle at Okinawa, where the only access to the Japanese
barricades were up the Maeda Escarpment, known as ‘Hacksaw Ridge’. He was the
first conscientious objector to be awarded the Medal of Honour and is the
epitome of the word hero. Audie Murphy, a fellow Medal of Honour recipient and
Western star tried to make a film about Doss in the 1950s, as did Hal B. Wallis
who produced classics such as Casablanca, The Maltese Falcon and True Grit. In
fact Doss, a modest man, turned down many requests for book and film
versions of his actions, because he was wary of whether his life, wartime
experiences, and Seventh-day Adventist beliefs would be portrayed inaccurately
or sensationally. Doss' only child, Desmond Doss Jr., stated: "The reason
he declined is that none of them adhered to his one requirement: that it be
accurate.” So who did the financiers hire to direct when they eventually
acquired the right to his story? Mel Gibson. The man who made a historical film
that featured two men who were born a hundred years apart (Braveheart) and told
the ‘true story’ of The Patriot, painting him as a family man and war hero,
even though he was a murderer and rapist. That spinning sound you can hear is
poor Doss turning in his grave. Doss finally gave the rights to his story to
Gregory Crosby (grandson of Bing Crosby) who wrote the treatment and brought it
to Permut Presentations who financed the film through Stan Jensen, a high-up
member of the Seventh-day Adventist Church. Terry Benedict won the rights to
make a documentary about Doss called The Conscientious Objector and secured the
rights for a dramatized version in the process, which he sold after Doss’s
death in 2006. The rights crossed many people’s hands and there were arguments
about how the film should be made, Bill Mechanic acquired and then sold the
rights to Walden Media who developed it with Permut Presentations. It
became clear that the story was leaning towards an Adventist agenda and when
Mechanic heard that it was going to show a PG-13 version of the war, he spent
years trying to buy the rights back. He managed in the end and hired Gibson as
he wanted him to create a concoction of violence and faith, as he did with The
Passion of the Christ. It all seems a million miles away from what Doss himself
would have wanted. The development hell didn’t end there, the film became an
international co-production between the US and Australia and when the
production lost its tax incentives the production team had to hire an almost
entirely Australian cast and crew. David Permut stated that they took great
care in maintaining the integrity of the story, since Doss was very religious
but much of his story was changed. His father’s backstory was changed, painting
him as abusive towards his mother and in one scene showing him pointing a gun
at her head, when the truth was he once had a drunken fight with his brother
and pointed a gun at him. There’s a big difference. It also played down Doss’s
prior combat service and completely changed the circumstances of his first
marriage. Doss met his wife when she came to his church selling Adventist books
and not in a hospital, indeed, she became a nurse after the war and he didn’t
miss their wedding day as was shown in the film. The battle scenes were
actually written by Gibson, who said they were influenced by nightmares he had
during childhood after his father, a WW2 veteran, described the horrors he
witnessed as bedtime stories. The truth is that Doss wasn’t even the first
conscientious objector to be awarded the Medal of Honour, he was actually the
third. The overall idea of what he did is sort of in the film but this isn’t
his story at all, it is everything he didn’t want a film of his life to be.
There were aspects of Doss story left out of the film as they were considered
too unbelievable, such as when Doss
stepped on a grenade to save his buddies and was hit by shrapnel, but as he was
being carried away by medics he saw another soldier hurt; since Doss himself
was a medic he jumped off his stretcher and treated that soldier and told the
medics to take care of other wounded soldiers; he then crawled back to safety
while being shot at by enemy snipers. Also, while lowering men down the ridge,
a Japanese soldier had Doss in his sights several times, and every time he did,
his gun jammed, preventing him from shooting him. I understand why they would
leave these facts out but I don’t know why they would be replaced by seeing a
solder using the limbless corpse of a dead comrade as a shield, or watching
Doss shower as if in a shampoo commercial. The battle scene features the
Wilhelm Scream for goodness sake, I found much of it quite appalling. It wasn’t
the level of violence or gore that disgusted me, I’m all for showing war for all
its bloody realism, what I took umbrage to was the bloody unrealism. Dunkirk
has shown the modern war film what to be, so I’m hoping that Hacksaw Ridge is
the last war film of its kind. It thinks it is anti-war but it’s not, and it
does a great disservice to a great for financial and religious gain. Andrew
Garfield is good in the lead role and I thought Hugo Weaving was exceptional in
his performance, it’s just a shame that their characters were fictional, when
the real people they were performing were interesting enough without the need
of a rewrite.
No comments:
Post a Comment