Eye in the Sky

Dir: Gavin Hood

2016

*****

Gavin Hood's Eye in the Sky took me somewhat by surprise. It explores the legal, political and ethical dilemmas involved regarding collateral damage, specifically during drone warfare. It's fantastic. Seen through the eyes of the drone pilot, surveillance specialists, military command and Government ministers, Eye in the Sky is a complex look at a complex issue. The case in point involves a group of suicide bombers (numbers two, four and five on the government's most wanted list) who have been searched for for over seven years. When all three suddenly appear in the same place in a remote village in Nairobi, Kenya, military officials prepare to capture. However, on the ground surveillance reveals that the hideout is full of explosives and it is clear that they are preparing for a suicide mission. The decision of whether to take them out via a drone flying above is left in the balance as the issue of authorization is unclear. Added to the legal issue is the fact that the house is surrounded by civilians, in particular, a little girl selling bread who takes everyone, particularly the pilot, by surprise. Each viewpoint is explored respectfully, whether the character be military or political, each are represented in a tasteful, fair and balanced manner. The issue is unclear and it becomes impossible to pick a side as either one isn't ideal. It is a very frightening and very real situation that is raised intelligently in what just might be 2016's best edge of your seat thriller. The intensity is unparalleled and inexhaustibly relentless. The performances are spectacular also, with each character locked in their own setting without ever meeting once throughout the duration of the film. The visuals are bold and give the right impact when warranted, one of the most striking realizations is that life and death, peace and war decisions are made in normal hotel rooms and offices alike. Emotions run high but a level of professionalism is always maintained throughout the film, there really isn't one forced or overcooked scene, even though you'd expect or forgive one. The weird thing while watching the film in a crowded cinema was the amount of laughter. It isn't a funny film, nor does it try to be but the situation is so ridiculous at times that you can't help but laugh at the absurdity of it. This also comes with its own impact when you remember that this sort of thing happens a lot more than you might have first thought. The conclusion is bold and important but not what you'd probably expect. A sure sign of a film's impact is when you're still thinking about it four days later. Easily one of the best thrillers I've seen in the last few years and certainly one of the best of 2016. It's nothing short of astonishing and a must see and a wonderful last film for the late great Alan Rickman.