Showing posts with label Found Footage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Found Footage. Show all posts

Monday, 17 June 2019

The Visit
Dir: M. Night Shyamalan
2015
*
The Last Airbender and The Happening weren’t great films, After Earth wasn’t as bad as everyone proclaimed it was, I have a soft spot for Signs and The Lady in the Water and The Village is a good film dammit. However, it is hard to tell that 2015’s The Visit was directed by the same man who brought us The Sixth Sense and Unbreakable. He made the brilliant Split just one year later. I honestly don’t understand how you can go from absolute garbage to great film in just under a year? Scrap that though, I don’t know how a director like M. Night Shyamalan can make a film like The Visit at this point in his career and think it is acceptable? Shyamalan has since said that he used his fee from 2013’s After Earth to self-produce this film in an attempt to regain artistic control after his recent movies had been denied final cut, and were even taken away from him in post-production. I’m beginning to see why. It’s a terribly conceived film in the ‘found-footage’ horror sub-genre that forgets all of the simple rules associated with it. The ‘found-footage’ is far too glossy and the narrative is painfully aware of itself. The story follows brother and sister; 15-year-old Becca (Olivia DeJonge) and 13-year-old Tyler (Ed Oxenbould) as they prepare for a five-day visit with their estranged grandparents while their divorced mother Loretta goes on a cruise with her boyfriend. Loretta reveals that she has not spoken to her parents in 15 years after marrying her high school teacher, of whom her parents disapproved. Having never met their grandparents, the teenagers intend to record a documentary film about their visit using a camcorder. Becca and Tyler meet their grandparents, referred to as "Nana" and "Pop Pop," at a train station. When they arrive at their isolated farmhouse, Becca and Tyler are instructed to never go into the basement because it contains mold, and that bedtime is at 9:30 every evening, after which they shouldn't leave their room. The first night, an hour past curfew, Becca ventures downstairs for something to eat and sees Nana projectile vomiting all over the house, which frightens her. She tells Pop Pop, who dismisses it as Nana having the stomach flu. He then reminds her not to leave their bedroom after 9:30 pm. The ‘fear of old people’ narrative is quite odious and it gets progressively worse. Over the next few days, Becca and Tyler notice their grandparents exhibiting more strange and disturbing behavior. Tyler walks into Pop Pop's shed and finds a huge pile of soiled adult diapers. Becca asks Nana about the day Loretta left home, and Nana begins to shake and scream. Later, Pop Pop and Nana are confronted by a woman they helped in counseling, and she goes into the backyard with them but is never seen leaving. Concerned about the events, Tyler decides to secretly film what happens downstairs at night, but Nana discovers the hidden camera, retrieves a large knife, and tries unsuccessfully to break into the children's locked bedroom. When Becca and Tyler view the camera footage of Nana with the knife, they contact Loretta and beg her to come get them. They show her images of her parents, and she panics and says they are not her parents. Realizing that they have been with strangers all week, the teenagers try to leave the house, but Nana and Pop Pop trap them inside and force them to play board games. Later, Becca sneaks into the basement and finds the corpses of her real grandparents, along with uniforms from the mental hospital at which they worked, revealing the impostors as escaped patients. Pop Pop grabs Becca and imprisons her in his bedroom with Nana, who tries to eat her. He then starts to torment Tyler psychologically by smearing his face with his dirty diaper. Becca fatally stabs Nana with a glass shard from a broken mirror, then runs into the kitchen and attacks Pop Pop. As Pop Pop starts to gain the upper hand, Tyler knocks him to the floor and kills him by repeatedly slamming the refrigerator door onto his head. The teens escape outside unharmed, where they are met by their mother and police officers. In the aftermath, Becca asks Loretta about what happened the day she left home. Loretta states that she had a major argument with her parents, during which she hit her mother and was then struck by her father. Loretta then left home and ignored their attempts to contact her. Loretta concludes that reconciliation was always possible had she wanted it. She then tells Becca not to hold on to anger over her mother and father's abandonment. The end credits scene then sees Tyler rap for the camera. The film doesn’t seem to know what it wants to be and tries its hand at horror, comedy and clever documentary techniques. It’s seriously painful to watch. The comedy elements of the film are far more shocking and horrifying than any of the horror, and the horror is a lazy mix of Ring, Paranormal Activity and every other cheap b-movie horror going. The jump scenes are predictable and they won’t make you jump. I think making the elderly and mentally ill the villains is pretty nasty, indeed, the the whole film is fairly tasteless. The whimsical musings on documentary film making are also fairly nauseating. Shyamalan has admitted in interviews that he had trouble keeping the tone for the film consistent during the editing phase, saying that the first cut of the film resembled an art house film more than a horror film. A second cut went in the opposite direction and the film became a comedy. He eventually struck a middle balance and cut the film as a thriller, which, according to him, helped tie the different elements together as they "could stay in service of the movie". Utter crap. You can’t polish a turd and the idea was a turd from the very beginning. He’s made mistakes before but after nine or so films and twenty odd years under his belt you’d think he would have realised. But then he made two good films within four years of it, so I don’t have a clue what The Visit was all about really, all I know is that it is awful in every single way a film can be.

Monday, 24 July 2017

Europa Report
Dir: Sebastián Cordero
2013
**
I have mixed feelings about ‘Found footage’ movies. The Blair Witch Project is massively overrated, the best example of how great it can be – and the biggest influence in the sub-genre as far as I can tell – is Remy Belvaux’s 1992 cult hit Man Bites Dog although you could argue the brilliant (and misunderstood) Cannibal Holocaust was the first. While Troll Hunter and Cloverfield utilised the method rather splendidly, the now overused technique seems stuck in Paranormal Activity hell, with only the VHS series remaining watchable and vaguely original. It seems baffling to me, considering we are a society that is now recorded 24 hours a day from every angle no matter where we are, that film makers still struggle to think of new ideas or how to incorporate home footage and CCTV into their films. I have thought of several situation where this method of filming could be utilised, and without wanting to shout ‘I thought of it first’ (because I didn’t), I had thought of space – or more specifically, a space ship – as the perfect place to make such a film. Europa Report does everything a good found footage film should do, with each CCTV shot looking authentic and unstaged. However, it incorporates these scenes into a sort of post-event documentary that just doesn’t work at all. A good found footage film – indeed, a good horror/thriller/mystery film in general – leaves the conclusion to the imagination of the audience. Again, the only time actual narration of film footage has worked is in the sub-genre’s granddaddy, the aforementioned Cannibal Holocaust. It’s like watching someone narrating through sign language at the corner of the screen when you’re not actually deaf, but with condescension. Europa Report should have been 2001: A CCTV Odyssey, instead it was like watching a bunch of inept astronauts, clumsily killing themselves until accidently landing their ship on an octopus nest. The big alien reveal is astonishingly anticlimactic, I had wondered whether the film would link with Gareth Edward’s brilliant 2010 movie Monsters (his aliens looked similar and came from Europa) but alas it was merely a coincidence. I say coincidence, but the truth of the matter is that Europa Report looks like so many spaceship horror films, I’m not sure it’s the appropriate word. While the visuals are polished and the pace is reassuringly slow, the fact is that they can’t even get the clichés right. At no point did I think I was watching footage of a group of astronauts in space, for me it was six actors, in a room, pretending to be in space. There was no illusion and certainly no magic. I felt nothing when one of them died, not because I’m a cold hearted crocodile, but because the film never connected with me on an emotional level. I can’t say I cared much for the characters in 2001: A Space Odyssey (my favourite space movie) but it was full of mystery, intrigue and possibilities. Europa Report has zero intrigue, little mystery and squanders any of the many possibilities it could have explored. You can’t blame any of this on a lack of budget (I would like to suggest John Carpenter’s Dark Star as an example), this is all about the writing – or lack of it. It’s one thing not to try but it’s another to not even pretend they did. All the ‘silent in space’ scenes were used when they ran out of script and when there was dialogue and longed for the eerie silence that only space can deliver. The visuals weren’t all bad but all the best scenes were ruined by the fake narrative ‘talking head’ interviews from mission control back on earth. It was terrifying when we first discovered that in space no one can hear you scream. Less terrifying when we found out that actually, people can, and you have to listen to their commentary of it and their emotionless fake crying. It wastes a brilliant cast too.

Thursday, 4 May 2017

Willow Creek
Dir: Bobcat Goldthwait
2013
**
Bobcat Goldthwait is an awesome writer and director, his two previous films; World's Greatest Dad and God Bless America are two of the most underrated but best examples of the best of modern satire, so my expectations were high, even though his venture into the found footage horror sub-genre was something of a puzzling surprise. I think I had hoped that he would do something clever with it, give the genre a satirical twist and maybe send it up a little, rather than just make a quick cheap horror to cash in on. I don't think either is true but I hope he made lots of money from Willow Creek and uses it to make much better films. I'm not the biggest fan of found footage horrors, they have a place but I feel the genre has been exhausted. Goldthwait brings nothing new to the table with Willow Creek, other than the fact he is the first director to make a film about chasing Big Foot (or Sasquatch if you'd prefer) using this style of filming. What I will give him credit for however is the story and character development. It does look and feel like you'd imagine a piece of found footage to be like. There isn't too much wobbly camera action and the jumps of scares are limited and never wasted. The biggest problem with it is that it is just okay. It's fine. Nothing more than that. It ticks all the boxes, is formulaic and predictable but is never over cooked. There are moments of interests along the story's life-span but Goldthwait gambles everything on the film's conclusion, which is a risky move that I'm not sure pays off. It is open to interpretation somewhat, which is a good thing in my opinion (I'm sure many others disagree) and I'm torn between two lines of thinking. The only problem is that whether either is true, neither is particularly impressive or handled well and I'm not sure whether either is sufficient pay off for sitting through an hour and a half of very little action. The film is 79 minutes long and I don't feel my time was well spent watching it. It's a good effort for a horror/found footage debut but it's a bitter disappointment given Goldthwait's talent and ability. If it were a brand new director I might suggest they showed promise but really, the most positive thing I can really say of it is that I've seen worse, which I don’t think is quite good enough.

Thursday, 29 December 2016

Cloverfield
Dir: Matt Reeves
2008
***
Drew Goddard's Cloverfield is a logical progression in the 'monster movie' genre but it doesn't really cover new ideas, only new techniques. The movie monsters of the 1950's were all metaphors for something much bigger such as the cold war and communism and Godzilla, the biggest monster of them all, is famously really all about fear of the atomic bomb, following the events at Hiroshima. It was producer J. J. Abram who came up with the original concept after visiting Japan. He saw lots of Godzilla toys and declared to others at his production company that America needed their own monster that wasn't the cute and cuddly King Kong. He was quoted as saying "We wanted something that was just insane and intense". After passing an old Escape from New York poster he also stated that he wanted the Statue of Liberty's severed head somewhere in the movie and the idea went from there. I've said it before but I believe J. J. Abram is the biggest creative fraud working in Hollywood today. However, Cloverfield tapped into something quite interesting and very much of the era. The found footage horror sub-genre was inspired by the rise of YouTube, mobile phone technology and the popularity of TV news. The vast amounts of 9/11 footage the world watched was clearly an influence but without wanting to give credit where I don't think it is due, this film does tap into the West's post-9/11 paranoia.  The style of filming, nicknamed shaky-cam, was relatively new at the time and certainly hadn't been used in a mainstream action movie before 2008. It was met with mixed reviews, while it worked as a 'found footage' piece it did get tired quite quickly and those who were prone to motion sickness had a tough time of it. The viral marketing of the film was key to its success, applaudable at the time but less so now that nearly every action/horror has tried the same technique ever since. The build-up was pretty effective, it was intense and quite exciting, it just went downhill fast once the monster was finally revealed. Somewhere between Blair Witch and Godzilla, Cloverfield really isn't that original, and the fact that it played on very real paranoia following 9/11 left a bit of a sour taste in the mouth. The marketing was very clever but it made the film rather soulless. Each character even had their own MySpace profile, meaning they cheapened cinema and spoiled social media for everyone at the same time. It was a little bit like being sold a cheap used car, we the customer were bamboozled and we convinced ourselves that this was the one we'd been waiting for but we probably should have known better. In fairness, it gives us everything it promised and we did take a test drive so more fool us for buying into it. Credit due though, I don't love it but it does have clever elements and the found footage genre hasn't seen much better since.

Wednesday, 2 December 2015

Banshee Chapter
Dir: Blair Erickson
2013
**
Banshee Chapter is one of the most frustrating films I've seen in quite some time. The premise was brilliant; based on the true events that have been uncovered regarding the CIA's 1950's mind control program called Project MKUltra and loosely following H. P. Lovecraft's novel From Beyond, the film had a brilliant balance of other worldliness and realism. It's filmed to begun with as a sort of documentary, although the rest of the film isn't, it rather thoughtlessly carries on the hand-held filming style. It's the first mistake of many. The beginning sequence sees a mix of well shot 'found footage' and real news reels from the 50's, 60's and 00's. It's completely believable, heightening the suspense and fueling one's intrigue. It then descends into cheap and tiresome creeping about in the dark as seen in The Blair Witch Project and Paranormal Activity series. I'm not a fan of the technique and Banshee Chapter certainly doesn't have the pay off that it's predecessors have. The acting is very convincing and the plot is always relatively clever, which only makes it's faults all the more obvious. I'm being harsh on this film because it promised to be so much more than it was and with a few tweaks it could have been. I'm looking forward to seeing more from Blair Erickson as he is clearly a talented director with big ideas, he just needs to steer away from the cliches, of which his debut is, I'm afraid, swamped in.

Monday, 27 July 2015


The Bay
Dir: Barry Levinson
2012
**
Barry Levinson and Michael Wallach's celebrated found footage horror; The Bay is a very clever idea and perfect for the horror sub-genre. So it's a terrible shame that it has been filmed in the worst possible way. Barry Levinson is a good director, I can see why he'd want to direct one of his own ideas but I honestly think he should have passed this onto someone else, maybe someone with documentary experience? It should have been terrifying but for the most part it is laughable. The camcorder footage looks too professional and the professional shots look too amateur, the script is so bad it made my skin crawl and the editing is totally overcooked. The acting is non-existent. The story repeats itself far too much, we know what the conclusion is within the first 20 minutes but it is repeated again and again through more and more unconvincing sub-plots. It's tiresome. The repeated times the male scientists makes reference to the female scientist's foreign accent is grating to say the least and made me quite angry towards the seventh time. Great idea, it's just that every component is totally wrong. A huge wasted opportunity by someone who seems not to understand both horror or documentary.

Tuesday, 23 June 2015

Paranormal Activity
Dir: Oren Peli
2009
**
Paranormal Activity was one of the most talked about films of 2009 but after all the hype I have to say I'm quite disappointed. It's a good idea, it's just that it has already been done and it's been done better. It's not a bad film, it's just because of the hype I was expecting something amazing. Many respectable film magazines gave it 5 stars. They aren't always reliable to be fair but 5 stars is a huge over-rate. I watched it on my own and went off to sleep afterwards and slept like a baby which is the sign of a below-par horror film as I'm actually a bit of a wimp. The ending was also a huge disappointment and a real cop-out if you ask me. It's like a campfire story come to life but without the all important intriguing story. It doesn't come close to Japanese horror, The Ring/The Eye/The Grudge, all are far better and original. I guessed at the time there would be many sequels, its got franchise written all over it, as many sub-standard horrors do these days.

Monday, 9 March 2015



Trollhunter
Dir: André Øvredal
2010
****
André Øvredal's 2010 film Trollhunter is a bit of a mixture of films including Blair Witch Project, Where the Wild things are, Jurassic Park and Rare exports. That said, it is also completely unique. There are plenty of monster films about these days as there are found Footage films (or Faux-documentaries if you will) but what the makers of this film have managed to achieve (quite brilliantly) is the perfect balance of scares and humour. The Trolls themselves look appropriately authentic to Norwegian folk tale and the final scene is as big and impressive as you'd expect from any monster film or blockbuster, which I found have all been a bit of a let down in recent years. It's not too often these days that a film is as good as you'd hoped, especially with such a different idea.

Monday, 2 March 2015

As AboveSo Below
Dir: John Erick Dowdle
2014
****
John Erick Dowdle's Found Footage style horror film As AboveSo Below is a film that doesn't really stick to one sub-genre. Horror films are the most varied of all the genres but the best ones are the ones that surprise with originality and intelligence. As AboveSo Below's strength is that it is actually a clever thriller with scary bits, a good story with tension and suspense and not just ghostly faces slightly off screen. The story is a little bit Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade but forgivably so. What starts out as a spooky cave excursion turns into a surreal nightmare, a quite compelling one at that. I usually don't like found footage films but this was fairly light on shaky camera tricks and was easy to watch, although I'm not sure this element brought anything extra, conventional filming would have been just as effective. The acting is marginally better than average too and the conclusion was not a disappointment. I'm being generous with my rating, it's not perfect by any means but the inventiveness and creepiness towards the end was quite thrilling. The slasher film is dead and although I don't think the Found Footage genre has reached its full potential, with films like this it is well on its way. The film also wins best film poster of the year.

Monday, 13 October 2014



Man Bites Dog (C'est arrivé près de chez vous) (AKA It Happened in Your Neighborhood)
Dir: Rémy Belvaux, André Bonzel, Benoît Poelvoorde
1992
*****
1992's Man Bites Dog remains a relatively misunderstood satire over twenty years after its release and I dare say it will continue to divide opinion like all great films should. Benoit Poeloorde's performance is terrifying, his unpredictability makes for very tense viewing but alas, his character Ben is always missing from the typical 100 best villain lists when it really should be at the top. This is the darkest of comedies, filmed as a documentary with a Dogma95 feel about it (ahead of its time), in striking B/W contrast, with the cast eventually becoming part of the story. It's very clever, very sick, quite funny and absolutely brilliant! That's why The Blair Witch Project ripped it off for their now infamous ending. Early 90s cinema saw quite an exciting rang of films that are often unfairly overlooked, this being of the best examples. Recommended to all those without heart conditions but a good sense of satirical humour.

Tuesday, 23 September 2014



V/H/S/2
Dir: Adam Wingard, Eduardo Sánchez, Simon Barrett, Gregg Hale, Gareth Evans, Timo Tjahjanto, Jason Eisener
2013
***
Although I'm giving V/H/S/2 the same 3 out of 5 stars I gave the original, it is a big improvement on its predecessor. The film that binds the shorts (Tape 49) still isn't great but it's a tiny bit better than the original. Phase I Clinical Trial was a strange first choice film as it really felt more like filler rather than the film to get you going. It was okay, colourful and interesting but the Found Footage cliches were there from the beginning and the idea seemed to be born from the idea of the brief, rather because it was a good idea and directed with restraint rather than embracing the possibilities. A Ride in the Park was a great idea, seeing the world from a Zombie's point of view (thanks to a helmet-cam they were wearing post-Zombie) is just the sort of idea this franchise is for and where its strength lies. Safe Haven is wonderfully dark, the way it is filmed is unfortunately the worst of all the movies but the idea is truly terrifying, although the less said about the last scene the better (Bogey and budget problems?). Slumber Party Alien Abduction is a great film to end on. The idea is great and very effective. It reminded me of a Spielberg film but with balls. I think the shaky camera footage was a little too shaky in places but the speed of the action was a welcome change of pace. It's a great franchise that is full of possibilities. It's not perfect just yet but I think it could be. The new sub-genre in horror to get excited about for sure.

 

V/H/S
Dir: Ti West, Radio Silence, Joe Swanberg, David Brukner, Adam Wingard, Glenn McQuaid
2012
***
 Found Footage has been overdone a little of late, it can get a bit samey so I welcome the inventiveness that V/H/S brings. That said, V/H/S is basically 50% brilliant and 50% crap. The film that binds the shorts together (tape 56) is probably the worst part of this film as it brings nothing to the overall film and it doesn't lead into the short films particularly well and is unnecessarily nasty at the start which I'm sure must have put many people of right away. The first film, Amateur Night, is probably the best of the lot. It has real scares, is creepy throughout and reaches a brilliant conclusion. Second Honeymoon is boring in comparison, the twist ending is disappointing to say the least, not to mention far too graphic to be on the right side of acceptable. The Sick Thing That Happened to Emily When She Was Younger was original and effective, probably the cleverest of the films but again, I think it could have been explored better and dare I say, saved for it's own feature length film. Tuesday the 17th is the token spoof film that seems totally out of place. Although, as ridiculous as the pixelated bad guy was, I quite liked him. The last film, 10/31/98 is probably the most fun of the films. The mysterious collective of directors that call themselves Radio Silence go for all out action. No need for character development, they get down to business, an idea that serves the film well. Overall, the film is definitely worth watching, along with The Cabin in the Woods (also released in 2012), this defines a genre to the point where others need to up their game (or stop). The overall aspect I most object to (apart from the fact very little of it is filmed on VHS) are the constant sexual and often sexually-violent scenes. What is it with horror films and guys with hand-held cameras? It's probably the most disturbing factor for me and it doesn't sit well, it's not nice seeing women treated like this and it's not nice seeing young men constantly portrayed as rapists. Let's see an end to it and some female horror directors would be a nice change too!

Friday, 12 September 2014

Into The Storm
Dir: Steven Quale
2014
**
Eighteen years after the release of Twister, it's fair to say it was time for a new big storm movie. Firstly, the effects are brilliant. Twister's effects aren't bad still but Into The Storm's are on another level. The special effects are so good in fact that the people and writing severely let it down. The whole film is supposedly watched as part of a found footage type documentary. This doesn't work at all, especially when they often forget to show the action from one of the many cameras we're supposed to believe would still work in that situation. I watched this with my Sister who is a Meteorologist. She informed me that all my favorite scenes were the ones that aren't actually possible but for the most part the science holds up. Shame really because by favorite bits only last for about 10 minutes, the rest is 80 minutes of truly awful video messages full of teenage angst, Father issues, child abandonment and flag waving. The inclusion of footage from two local 'jackasses' is embarrassing and in bad taste. It's like wearing a dirty old trench coat over a beautiful Italian suit, the core is good but the rest is rotten. What a huge wasted opportunity!