52 Tuesdays
Dir: Sophie Hyde
2014
****
Sophie Hyde’s fascinating drama 52 Tuesdays is a slow-burner and I have
to say I didn’t warm to it all at first, however, there is a good reason for
that and it is the same reason why I think the film is such a triumph of
independent film and creative writing. Our story begins in suburban Australia.
16-year-old Billie lives with her lesbian mother Jane and her uncle Harry. Her
father Tom is divorced from her mother, following the realisation that she was
a lesbian. Her uncle Harry is more like a brother to her and you could say her
childhood has been unconventional but decisions are made as a family and
everyone is always open with one another, with Tom still very much part of the
family. One day Jane reveals plans to undergo a gender transition, now calling
himself James. She has put off telling Billie until the last minute as she is
worried about how she would take it. Tom and Harry are clearly irritated by the
way she has decided to tell Billie and that it has taken her so long to make
the decision – one that they’ve seen coming for a while. James decides he wants
Billie to live with Tom for a year, with which Tom has agreed, as she doesn’t
know how she will be reacting to the hormone treatment and needs time and space
alone. Billie accepts her mother’s transition with no issue but she doesn’t
like the fact she is being kicked out of the house. She forces James to give
her a time limit, to which James responds ‘a year’. A decision is made then to
have regular weekly visits restricting the time Billy is together with
Jane/James to Tuesdays from 16:00 - 22:00, starting on the 23rd of August. The
film is then divided into the corresponding 52 segments, each covering one
Tuesday, and starting with a title card showing the date with a world event
that also happened on that date. At first the meetings a stifled as the two
simply have dinner together and watch a bit of television. After catching two
older students, Josh and Jasmine, being intimate with one another in a school
store room, Billie ends up befriending them and meeting them regularly. The
three students begin to experiment with each other on a sexual level but they
can only meet on Tuesdays as they only have access to the store room on that
day. When the students loose access to the room, Billie hatches a plan and
pretends to her father that she is now going to spend longer at James’s house
on Tuesdays and will now be home at 12.00. She asks Harry to cover for her as
well as lending her access to an apartment he has keys for. Billie then films
the sexual experiments of the threesome, as well as interviewing them. After a
few months James suffers a setback and is told that he has to stop testosterone
injections because of a rare condition of his body not tolerating it. Billie
becomes more distant and more interested in her friends as James becomes more
and more low. Tom finds out about Billie’s lies and Jasmine also get tired of
Billie’s films. She feels that it is all about Billie’s film and doesn’t want
to be part of her experiments anymore. After sending a nude photograph of
herself to Jasmine, Billie gets into trouble as this is considered child
pornography. The school principal, James, Tom and Jasmine strongly disapprove
it. Billie is shocked that James destroys one of her tapes, and refuses further
contact with him. Josh does not want physical contact with Billie anymore
because of Tom's disapproval. Later Billie is willing to destroy a remaining
tape, but since it is in James' house who she no longer visits, she is
dependent on Harry, who finally destroys it for her. When her father is
involved in a motorcycle crash everyone is forced to reassess what is
important. When the year is finished, Billie reconciles with James and arrives
home, moving in at precisely the same time she left one year before. Billie,
Josh and Jasmine soon become friends again. The initial problem I had with the
film was the disjointed narration. The beginning of the film is constantly
interrupted with footage Billie has taken of herself talking nonsense into the
camera – clearly retrospectively from the future. Most of the footage is of her
pausing for excruciating lengths of time. It really only became obvious that
this was about a young girl’s look at sexuality and adult relationships at
about a third of the way in. I wondered why we didn’t see more of James’s
transition – which I thought was the point of the film. However, the more I
learned about the film, the more I understood it. The film has rules. The Six Rules of Making '52 Tuesdays' were as
follows: (1) The film will be shot once a week, every Tuesday (and only on
Tuesdays), over a full year (or 52 Tuesdays) ; (2) The film will be shot
chronologically; what is shot on a specific Tuesday is what happens on that
Tuesday (i.e. no re-shoots!) ; (3) Something from each of the fifty-two
Tuesdays has to be shown ; (4) It will be a scripted drama but will allow the
script to be heavily influenced during the year, with the writing continuing
until the final Tuesday ; (5) A non-professional cast will be used who can be
different but connected to their characters and will influence their story ;
and (6) Rather than artificially creating change, allow the subtle but genuine
changes over the course of the year to challenge our own expectations of time
and change and influence the story we tell. That must have been a huge
undertaking, one that really took effort and discipline. After halfway through
the film the changes start to become obvious, not just in James but in every
one of the characters. It’s quite remarkable. Screenwriter Matthew Cormack
said: "It seemed to me how we made the film, confining our narrative and
shoot time to fifty-two consecutive Tuesdays, could inform the very ideas of
what the characters were grappling with, especially around the pursuit of
authenticity and the promise of change. Ultimately, however, as a writer, it
was not about relinquishing control to some kind of chance and circumstance but
about the opportunity to embrace the chaos of the unknown in a way that would
hopefully show me (and consequently an audience) something about the challenge
of constructing a life, a story, an identity, a gender, a sexuality, only with
the materials we're given in our short, limited lives." For me, this is
brilliant film making – I want to say guerrilla film making but that isn’t what
it is, it’s something far more profound. None of the cast were professional
actors but I think after this film they are probably more qualified than most.
Of growing up on screen, lead actress Tilda Cobham-Hervey said: "When I
began working on '52 Tuesdays' I was 16, I had never had a boyfriend...Over the
course of this project I became an adult, I fell in love, completed high
school, talked about things I had never even let myself think about, I learnt
what sad was and angry was and I escaped a bubble and learnt about the
incredible wonder and tragedy of the real world. I learnt what the words 'real'
and 'true' meant, which are far more wonderful than any other word in
existence. One of the questions that was often discussed during this process
was "are you living an authentic life?" A loaded question that was my
basis for taking control of my own person and actually deciding how to get on
with this thing called 'growing up'." The wonderful thing about this – and
with all the other characters – is that you can see it on screen. The start of
the film only makes sense when you reach the end, so while the film really
needs perseverance, the rewards are fruitful. My only niggles is that I wanted
to learn more about the transition process.
No comments:
Post a Comment