Leave
No Trace
Dir: Debra Granik
2018
*****
It’s hard to believe that it has taken eight long years for
director Debra
Granik to produce another feature film,
because after the fantastic Winter’s Bone I thought she’d have the pick of
projects. I’m not sure why it has taken so long, she did make the documentary
Stray Dog in-between, but I’m glad Leave No Trace is here. I’m also unsurprised
that it is as good as it is. Maybe, like many a great director, we should
expect quality over quantity from now on. I digress, Leave No Trace is a
perfect example of simple but strong ingredients coming together to make the
perfect story. The first great decision was to cast Ben Foster in the lead
role. As soon as he was on board, he and Granik Granik worked together to remove
around 40% of the dialogue to make the film have less exposition and to give it
more realism. The second great decision was to cast Thomasin McKenzie as Ben’s daughter. The young actor is superb in
what I would suggest is one of the best – if not the best - performance of
2018. The film tells the story of Will, an Iraq War veteran who is suffering from Post
Trumatic Stress Disorder. Due to his
situation, he lives with his 13-year-old daughter, Tom, in a public park
outside Portland, Oregon. They live in almost total isolation, only entering
town for occasional food and supplies. Will makes their money by selling his
VA-issued painkillers to other veterans. After Tom is accidentally spotted in
the woods by a jogger, officers arrest them and place them into social
services. They are given food and a house on a tree farm in rural Oregon, on
the condition that Will abides by the rules of the home owner and social
services. Will begrudgingly begins to work on the settlement packaging pine
trees, while Tom begins school and interacts with local kids her age in
a club. Will feels oppressed by others' presence and tells Tom they are
returning to the woods. She follows him but with reluctance. Will and Tom catch
a ride north with a long-haul trucker, who lets them out, at Will's direction,
on the edge of trackless woods. They hike in a direction Will expects to lead
to an unoccupied cabin, but cold and darkness force them to build a makeshift
tent to survive the night. The next day, they find an abandoned cabin and move
in. Will leaves to find food but does not return for some time. Tom walks out
to look for him, eventually finding him unconscious at the bottom of a hill,
presumably from a slip and fall. She gets help from some locals passing by, who
take them back to their mobile home community. One of them suggests taking Will
to a hospital, but Tom, knowing that going to a hospital could mean going back
into social services, refuses. A local woman calls a friend of hers, a former
Army medic (and fellow PTSD sufferer), who gets Will on the road to recovery.
He also lends Will his own therapy dog to
ease his mental adjustment to society. Will and Tom stay in the community for
some time while Will’s injuries heal. Tom likes this new home, and hopes that
she and her father can stay there permanently. Will, however, continues to feel
overwhelmed by social interaction and insists that they leave again. Tom
protests this, telling him "the same thing that’s wrong with you isn’t
wrong with me". When Will leaves anyway, Tom says that she can not go with
him this time, and needs to try to live a normal life. They tearfully hug and
part ways. It is both a happy and a sad ending, but also neither. It’s a real
slice of life. Along their journey certain big issues are explored but the film
is never judgmental and is always subtle. There is comment on the
problem of homelessness, particularly within the ex-services.
Ex-military are let down in nearly every country, generally by
governments, but the film does show the help they receive from charities. PTSD
is however, still something that is handled poorly, due to a lack of
understanding and a lack of research funding. Will selling his drugs says a lot
about the system, it’s a terrible way of making money but a necessity,
also suggesting that the drugs don’t work for the reason they are prescribed. I
can understand why local authorities can’t have people living in public land
but simply moving them on and demolishing their homes isn’t enough. Will and
Tom do receive help however and no one is painted as a bad guy, but the system
doesn’t really work for anyone. Prevention is the word unspoken. The other word
is isolation. The pair chose isolation in many respects but all meanings of the
word are explored, particularly in their relationship with each
other. The last scene might seem like an abandonment but the point is Tom lets
her father go, every relationship is based on a mutual understanding
and respect. True love is doing what is best for the other person, no matter
how hard and unnatural it might seem. I’m pretty sure the word is never
uttered, but this film really is about the love between a father and his
daughter. It’s rather sombre at times, never over-dramatised but
still full of raw emotion. The direction is also perfect, with great big open
shots that are met with intimate moments when needed. It looks stunning
throughout. What I liked most was how easy it was to understand the characters,
even thought I have nothing in common with them. The story doesn’t preach and
is never patronising. It is the only example of an ending that I think I should
hate – and I sort of do and then I don’t – but is brilliant. It is the best
conclusion for the story, even though every part of your brain is telling you
otherwise. I think it’s a stunning piece of work, a future classic for sure.
No comments:
Post a Comment